Narratives in conflict and the limits on the interpreter’s agency: A case study from the UN Peacekeeping mission in Lebanon
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52034/lanstts.v20i.597Keywords:
intercultural mediation; military context; interpreting training; narratives; agencyAbstract
This article presents a socio-linguistic analysis of interpreting in conflict zones and paints a picture of the limits on the interpreter’s agency when working in the field. It focuses on the interpreter’s behaviour towards cultural and linguistic barriers in communication between foreign military personnel and the civilian population in Lebanon. The aim is to analyse the level of agency that the interpreter has when working in a military deployment, taking into account the context and the narrative features that require mediation. Data were gathered through interviews with interpreters in Lebanon and analysed by applying narrative theory. Knowing and appreciating both the theoretical context and the linguistic and cultural barriers identified through the analysis are fundamental to understanding the difficult role that the interpreter-mediator plays in conflict settings and to reflecting on interpreter training that is appropriate to this context.
References
Angelelli, C. V. (2003). The interpersonal role of the interpreter in cross-cultural communication: A sur-vey of conference, court and medical interpreters in the US, Canada and Mexico. In L. Bru-nette, G. L. Bastin, I. Hemlin, & H. Clarke (Eds.), The Critical Link 3: Interpreters in the communi-ty. Selected papers from the Third International Conference on Interpreting in Legal, Health and Social Service Settings (pp. 15–26). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.46.06ang
Angelelli, C. V. (2004). Medical interpreting and cross-cultural communication. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486616
Baker, M. (2006). Translation and conflict: A narrative account. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203099919
Baker, M. (2010). Interpreters and translators in the war zone: Narrated and narrators. The Transla-tor, 16(2), 197–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2010.10799469
Bruner, J. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1086/448619
Federici, F., & O’Brien, S. (Eds.). (2019). Translation in cascading crisis. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429341052
Gómez-Amich, M. (2018) Life in conflict: A series of narratives by locally recruited interpreters from Afghanistan. Close Encounters in War Journal, (1), 22–44, Special Issue: “Close encounters in ir-regular and asymmetric warfare”.
Hall, E., & Hall, T. (1959). The silent language. Anchor books.
Hoedemaekers, I., & Soeters, J. (2009). Interactions rituals and language mediation during peace mis-sions: Experiences from Afghanistan. In C. Caforio (Ed.), Advances in military sociology: Essays in honour of Charles C. Moskos (pp. 329–352). Emerald Group. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1572-8323(2009)000012A024
Inghilleri, M. (2005). The sociology of Bourdieu and the construction of the ‘object’ in translation and interpreting studies. The Translator, 11(2), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2005.10799195
Inghilleri, M. (2007). National sovereignty versus universal rights: Interpreting justice in a global con-text. Social Semiotics, 17(2), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330701311488
Inghilleri, M. (2010). You don’t make war without knowing why, The Translator, 16(2), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2010.10799468
Katan, D. (2009). Translation as intercultural communication. In J. Munday (Ed.), The Routledge com-panion to translation studies (pp. 74–92). Routledge.
Kinnunen, T., & Koskinen, K. (2010). Translators’ agency. Tampere University Press.
Manojlovic, B. (2010). Dealing with complexities of identity conflict: Contentious narratives and possi-bilities of their transformation. Human Security Perspectives, 7(1), 1–16.
Moreno-Bello, Y. (2017). Aplicación de estudios sobre el lenguaje en zonas en conflicto: El caso del intérprete de guerra [Applying language studies to conflict zones: the case of the war inter-preter]. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Alcalá.
Moreno-Bello, Y. (2021). Negotiating ideologies in conflict zones: The case of the interpreter in Leba-non. In M. Todorova & L. Ruiz Rosendo (Eds.), Interpreting conflict: A comparative framework (pp. 113–133). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66909-6_6
Moser-Mercer, B., Kherbiche, L., & Class, B. (2014). Interpreting conflict: Training challenges in human-itarian field interpreting. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 6(1), 140–158. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/hut025
Moser-Mercer, B. (2015). Interpreting in conflict zones. In H. Mikkelson & R. Jourdenais (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of interpreting (pp. 302–316). Routledge.
Nida, E. (2001). Contexts in translating. Amsterdam. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.41
Pöchhacker, F. (2008). Interpreting as mediation. In C. Valero-Garcés & A. Martin (Eds.), Crossing bor-ders in community interpreting: Definitions and dilemmas (pp. 9–26). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.76.02poc
Ruiz Rosendo., L., & Persaud, M. C. (2018). On the frontline: Mediating across languages and cultures in peacekeeping operations. Armed Forces & Society, 45(3), 472–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X18755108
Somers, M. (1992). Narrativity, narrative identity, and social action: Rethinking English working-class formation. Social Science History, 16(4), 591–630. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0145553200016679
Somers, M. (1997). Deconstructing and reconstructing class formation theory: Narrativity, relational analysis, and social theory. In J. Hall (Ed.), Reworking class Ithaca (pp. 73–105). Cornell Univer-sity Press.
Somers, M., & Gibson, G. (1994). Reclaiming the epistemological ‘other’: Narrative and the social con-struction of identity. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Social theory and the politics of identity (pp. 37–99). Blackwell.
Stahuljak, Z. (1999). The Violence of neutrality: Translators in and of the war [Croatia, 1991–1992]. College Literature, 26(1), 34–51.
Taft, R. (1981). The role and personality of the mediator. The Mediating Person: Bridges between Cul-tures, 53–88.
Todorova, M. (2016). Interpreting conflict mediation in Kosovo and Macedonia. Linguistica Antver-piensia, New Series: Themes in Translation Studies, 15, 227–240. https://doi.org/10.52034/lanstts.v0i15.392
Wadensjö, C. (2008). In and off the Show: Co-constructing ‘invisibility’ in an interpreter mediated talk show interview. META, 53(1), 184–203. https://doi.org/10.7202/017982ar
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Linguistica Antverpiensia, New Series – Themes in Translation Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 Deed that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. The material cannot be used for commercial purposes.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
